NTISthis.com

Evidence Guide: PMASUP540B - Analyse equipment performance

Student: __________________________________________________

Signature: _________________________________________________

Tips for gathering evidence to demonstrate your skills

The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!

From the Wiki University

 

PMASUP540B - Analyse equipment performance

What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?

Determine theoretical performance.

  1. Identify item of plant or equipment to be analysed
  2. Locate and interpret design specification
  3. Identify process materials being processes/to be processed during verification trial
  4. Determine process material properties under process conditions
  5. Calculate theoretical performance of component(s) with that material under those conditions.
Identify item of plant or equipment to be analysed

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Locate and interpret design specification

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identify process materials being processes/to be processed during verification trial

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Determine process material properties under process conditions

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Calculate theoretical performance of component(s) with that material under those conditions.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conduct trial.

  1. Design verification trial to be compatible with theoretical analysis
  2. Determine measurements needed from trial to yield required data
  3. Select equipment suitable to give required measurements
  4. Arrange for verification trial with relevant process personnel
  5. Set up required measurement equipment
  6. Supervise trial and ensure trial conditions are appropriate
  7. Collect trial data for analysis.
Design verification trial to be compatible with theoretical analysis

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Determine measurements needed from trial to yield required data

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Select equipment suitable to give required measurements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arrange for verification trial with relevant process personnel

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Set up required measurement equipment

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supervise trial and ensure trial conditions are appropriate

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collect trial data for analysis.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Verify performance of plant/equipment.

  1. Compare theoretical with actual performance
  2. Determine significance of variation between theoretical and actual performance
  3. Investigate any suspicious results and take appropriate action.
Compare theoretical with actual performance

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Determine significance of variation between theoretical and actual performance

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investigate any suspicious results and take appropriate action.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recommend required action.

  1. Determine appropriate action to bring performance to desired level
  2. Initiate the corrective action in accordance with company procedures.
  3. Determine measures to increase equipment productivity
  4. Re-check performance after corrective action is implemented.
Determine appropriate action to bring performance to desired level

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initiate the corrective action in accordance with company procedures.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Determine measures to increase equipment productivity

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Re-check performance after corrective action is implemented.

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessed

Teacher: ___________________________________ Date: _________

Signature: ________________________________________________

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructions to Assessors

Evidence Guide

The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the Performance Criteria, Required Skills and Knowledge, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Overview of assessment

Assessment of this unit should include demonstrated competence on actual plant and equipment in a work environment. The unit will be assessed in as holistic a manner as is practical and may be integrated with the assessment of other relevant units of competency. Assessment will occur over a range of situations which will include disruptions to normal, smooth operation.

Assessment might typically be by an analysis project.

This unit of competency requires a significant body of knowledge which will be assessed through questioning and the use of what-if scenarios both on the plant and off the plant.

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Competence must be demonstrated in the ability to carry out the analysis without undue disruption to the process.

Consistent performance should be demonstrated. In particular look to see that:

trial design is appropriate

data taken during trial matches that required for the analysis

the analysis is carried out in a structured manner

recommended changes can be justified based on the comparison of trial and theoretical data.

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Assessment will require access to an operating plant over an extended period of time, or a suitable method of gathering evidence of operating ability over a range of situations. A bank of projects will be required as will a bank of questions which will be used to probe the reasoning behind the observable actions.

Method of assessment

In all plants it may be appropriate to assess this unit concurrently with relevant teamwork and communication units.

In a major hazard facility, it may be appropriate to assess this unit concurrently with relevant OHS units.

Guidance information for assessment

Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the oracy, language and literacy capacity of the assessee and the work being performed.

Required Skills and Knowledge

This describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit.

Required skills

Competence, for the practical completion of the job, includes the ability to:

calculate equipment and component performance from the design specification

determine equipment and design performance from practical trials

determine the 'limiting component' in the performance of an item of equipment or a process

determine possible performance of an item of equipment/process if practical improvements were made to the 'limiting item'.

Required knowledge

Knowledge and understanding of the materials, equipment and process sufficient to predict their interactions and their impacts on performance.

Knowledge of the enterprise procedures and policies along with the ability to implement them within appropriate time constraints and in a manner relevant to the job.

Knowledge of:

methods of identifying and calculating theoretical performance

ways of trialling, trial design and implementation

methods of data analysis to determine trial outcomes

methods of interpreting information deduced from trial data.

Range Statement

The Range Statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the Performance Criteria, is detailed below. Add any essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts.

Codes of practice/ standards

Where reference is made to industry codes of practice, and/or Australian/international standards, the latest version must be used.

Context

This competency unit includes the analysis of plant, equipment and equipment components. This competency applies to all work environments and sectors within the chemical, hydrocarbons and oil refining industry, but does require both a theoretical/ mathematical and a practical analysis of the process.

The competency does not require a knowledge of industry sectors and materials other than that in which the technician works. It assumes an understanding of the operation of all relevant equipment and processes but does not necessarily require them to be used personally.

Typical problems include:

worn equipment/components

validation of new equipment/components to design specification

performance analysis in order to upgrade process performance.

Health, safety and environment (HSE)

All operations to which this unit applies are subject to stringent health, safety and environment requirements, which may be imposed through State or Federal legislation, and these must not be compromised at any time. Where there is an apparent conflict between Performance Criteria and HSE requirements, the HSE requirements take precedence.